International and Comparative Law Review

Menu

Skip to content
  • About
    • Membership
    • Executive Board
  • Current Issue
  • 2026 Symposium
  • ICLR News
  • Alumni
  • Submissions
  • Featured
  • Posts

You Can Run But You Cannot Hide: John Doe Summons Issued to Reveal Offshore Accounts Held By Citibank and Bank of America Customers in Belize.

BY GINA LOREDO – “Offshore tax havens cost the United States approximately $100 billion per year; worldwide, the revenue losses from tax havens may be over $250 billion.” [1] Obtaining records from a foreign bank presents a challenge for the United States because they are not under United States jurisdiction. In order to deal with this issue, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has used “John Doe” summons, which are special third-party summons used when the name of taxpayers under investigation are unknown.[2] “The John Doe summons is directed to a U.S. bank where a targeted foreign bank maintains a correspondent account, [which] is an account held by a foreign bank at a U.S. bank in order to conduct transactions in U.S. currency . . . without having a U.S. presence.”[3]

The issuance of a John Doe Summons over a foreign bank by a U.S. federal judge in 2008 in search of hidden offshore accounts held by United States citizens began the upheaval of IRS investigations throughout various countries,. The United States has used the power granted by John Doe Summons to collect hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties from individuals trying to circumvent the tax system through foreign bank accounts.

The IRS requires you to file a Foreign Bank Account Report with the Department of Treasury if you have any offshore bank accounts exceeding $10,000. On one hand, if an individual files erroneously they face a minimum penalty of $10,000; on the other hand, if there is willful error when filing, the minimum penalty is $100,000. [4]

In 2008, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted the issuance of a John Doe Summons on Union Bank of Switzerland AG (UBS) demanding they disclose records of U.S. citizens who maintained unreported accounts at their bank in Switzerland. “In response to the petition, UBS argued that Swiss banking secrecy laws, the Switzerland-U.S. income tax treaty, and principles of comity militated against disclosure of the U.S. taxpayers’ information.”[5] The dispute between the Department of Justice and UBS ultimately transformed into a dispute between the U.S. and Swiss governments which was resolved out of court and resulted in the UBS ultimately revealing 10,000 U.S. citizen held accounts. [6]

After its UBS victory, the IRS has issued John Doe summons to various foreign banks such as Switzerland’s Zuercher Kantonalbank Bank (ZKB) and Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited in the Bahamas, Barbados, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Hong Kong, Malta, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Most recently, in September of this year, U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro entered an order authorizing the IRS to serve John Doe summons permitting them to seek records of U.S. taxpayers holding offshore accounts at Belize Bank International Limited’s (BBIL) and Belize Bank Limited’s (BBL) correspondent accounts at Bank of America and Citibank. [7] The John Does Summonses will provide information about U.S. citizens using financial institutions in Belize and even whether funds were transferred to other jurisdictions. [8] IRS commissioner John Koskinen said that “[t]his court action further demonstrates [their] relentless efforts to pursue and catch those evading taxes with hidden offshore accounts no matter where they are or what structures are used to hide behind.” [9]

The IRS has been able to identify many individuals that have offshore bank accounts because of information revealed from taxpayers that have come forward through the IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program.[10] This program allows U.S. taxpayers to inform the IRS of their offshore bank account before subjecting themselves to criminal liability if and when the IRS discovers their offshore tax havens. To date there have been “tens of thousands of individuals [that] have come forward voluntarily to disclose their foreign financial accounts, taking advantage of special opportunities to comply with the U.S. tax system and resolve their tax obligations” [11] The program has demonstrated to be very effective and, even though the penalty fine has risen since 2012, the immunity from criminal prosecution given in return for the disclosures has proven to be a high incentive for individuals to come clean. [12] At this rate, those individuals hiding funds in foreign accounts who have decided to abstain from disclosing their wrong doings to the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program will have their names uncovered and found by the IRS.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

[1] Laura Szarmach, Piercing the Veil of Bank Secrecy? Assessing the United States’ Settlement in the Ubs Case, 43 Cornell Int’l L.J. 409, 410 (2010) (citing Staff of S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Affairs, Perm. Subcomm. on Investigations, 110th Cong., Report on Tax Haven Banks and U.S. Tax Compliance 1 & n.1 d 2008), available at http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_ files/071708PSIReport.pdf.)

[2] Id.

[3] Stephanie C. Chomentowski, The Use of ‘John Doe’ Summons To Enforce US Tax Laws, Blank Rome Counselors at Law (Sep. 22, 2015), http://www.blankrome.com/index.cfm?contentID=37&itemID=368.

[4] IRS, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), https://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self-Employed/Report-of-Foreign-Bank-and-Financial-Accounts-FBAR (Nov. 8, 2015).

[5] Szarmach, supra note 1 at 410-412.

[6] Id.

[7] Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs, Court Authorizes IRS to Issue Summonses to Discover U.S. Taxpayers with Offshore Bank Accounts at Belize International Limited and Belize Bank Limited, (Sep. 16, 2015), http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/court-authorizes-irs-issue-summonses-discover-us-taxpayers-offshore-bank-accounts-belize-ba-0.

[8] Id.

[9] Id.

[10] Robert W. Wood, IRS Hunts Belize Accounts, Issues John Doe Summons to Citibank, BofA, Forbes (Sep. 17, 2015), www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2015/09/17/irs-hunts-belize-accounts-issues-john-doe-summons-to-citibank-bofa/.

[11] IRS Announces Key Milestone in FATCA Implementation; U.S. Begins Reciprocal Automatic Exchange of Tax Information under Intergovernmental Agreements. https://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/IRS-Announces-Key-Milestone-in-FATCA-Implementation%3B-U.S.-Begins-Reciprocal-Automatic-Exchange-of-Tax-Information-under-Intergovernmental-Agreements (Nov. 8, 2015).

[12] IRS Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program https://www.irs.gov/uac/2012-Offshore-Voluntary-Disclosure-Program (Nov. 8, 2015).

This entry was posted in ICLR Posts and tagged Bank of America, banks, Belize, Citibank, Department of Treasury, Foreign Bank Account Report, foreign banks, Gina Loredo, IRS, John Doe Summons, offshore, tax on November 16, 2015 by Elizabeth Fata.  Comments Off on You Can Run But You Cannot Hide: John Doe Summons Issued to Reveal Offshore Accounts Held By Citibank and Bank of America Customers in Belize.    

Post navigation

Previous Post: More Than One Hundred Years Later, It Is [Past] Time for the United States to Formally Recognize the Armenian Genocide Next Post: The Debate Over the EU’s Open Border Policy in the Wake of the Paris Attacks

CURRENT ISSUE

 

Volume 33, Issue 2

 

Human Rights in the Americas Symposium: An Examination of Past, Present, and Future by Caroline Bettinger-López et al.

May 8, 2026

 

Crossing Borders: The U.S. And Canadian Adoption of the Wagner Act and the Limits of U.S. Preemption by Grace Winkeljohn

May 8, 2026

 

Legislating With an Expiration Date & the Duty to Reevaluate: Sunset Provisions as a Safeguard in Self-defense Laws by Samantha Morales

May 8, 2026

 

Expanding “We the People”: Constitutional Language and Gender (In)Equality in the United States, France, Germany, and Sweden by Sophia Elaine Ward

May 8, 2026

 

Protection of the Human Rights of Older Persons in the Americas and the Caribbean by Gloria Monique de Mees

May 8, 2026

 

Obstetric Violence in the Case Law of the Universal and Inter-American Human Rights Systems by Carmen Cecilia Martínez López

May 8, 2026

 

Tools of Genocide: Forced Assimilation in Canada by Dr. Pamela Palmater et al.

May 8, 2026

 

Police Accountability for Racial Justice and Equality: A Human Rights Analysis of Perceptions of Police Legitimacy in Orlando, Florida by Katherine Wilson McCoy et al.

May 8, 2026

 

The Decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Case of Angulo Losada V. Bolivia: A Catalyst for the Rights of Girls and Victims of Sexual Violence by Brisa De Angulo et al.

May 8, 2026

 

Homelessness in the Caribbean: From Colonial Roots to Rights-based Responses by Wilmy Dessalines et al.

May 8, 2026

 

ICLR NEWS

 

Sustainability in Style: The Legal Landscape Shaping the Fashion Industry’s Future

 

Volume 30 Candidates Announced

Tags

abortion antitrust Apple Artificial Intelligence bitcoin Canada China climate change copyright Covid Crypto Cryptocurrency Cuba Danielle T. Gauer Data Protection Europe European Union Florida France human rights ICC Immigration intellectual property International Law Iran ISIS Israel legislation Maritime Law NATO Nikki Rigl Obama Olympics Putin Russia SEC Sports law Trump Turkey Ukraine UNCLOS United Kingdom United Nations United States Venezuela

STAY CONNECTED

 

UMICLR on Instagram   UMICLR on Facebook   I&CLR on RSS

© 2025 University of Miami. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions of students, professors, and practitioners that appear on this site do not
reflect the official position of the International and Comparative Law Review or the University of Miami School of Law on
any particular issue, legal or otherwise.